Dear Croydon Voters,
I would like to thank each and every one of you who supported my candidacy for the Croydon School Board. The 17 votes I received was significant for a little-known write-in candidate. This figure was woefully short of the 60 votes delivered to sitting board member George Caccavaro. This was a hotly contested election, due in no small part to the PTO's unfavorable response to my calls for fiscal responsibility.
I wish George the best, and hope that he has the courage to champion the changes needed to control spending and place the interests of Croydon citizens first.
There is much to do, and I plan to continue working with the citizens committee developing long term plans for the District. Our greatest opportunity lies with the Newport agreement due to expire in mid-2010. During my involvement in school district matters, parents have consistently expressed concern for various aspects of this agreement, and of the services provided by Newport School District.
The departure of Sunapee from the SAU caused Newport to scale back its SAU administrative operations. Unfortunately, they failed to scale back in proportion to the loss of revenue from Sunapee. As a result, the spending in the SAU bureaucracy per property dollar will rise dramatically. This can be seen in the "SAU Services" line item of the Croydon budget. This item alone is budgeted to increase 81.5% this year! Double-digit spending increases on non-educational services is unacceptable and a direct consequence of the terms of our association with Newport School District.
Together, we can restore community control of education and operate our schools in a manner that best serves our community, not the special interests. I look forward to working with members of our community today and in the future.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 863-7613 or by email at jimpeschke@joltmail.com.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Jim Peschke Running for the Croydon School Board as a Write-in Candidate
Dear Croydon Residents,
My name is Jim Peschke, and I've been a resident of Croydon since November 2006. I am a parent of two small children. I would like to ask for your support as a write-in candidate for the Croydon School Board on March 11th.
Since I am new to Croydon, I'd like to explain my positions and motivation for running. The Croydon School board created a citizen's group tasked with addressing the arrangement we have with Newport. As an active member of this group, I've familiarized myself with the issues facing Croydon when this agreement expires in 2010. Any new agreement could be a boon or a bust for Croydon, and I'm determined to see things work in our favor.
My wife and I have been active in education reform since 2002. But let me be clear: Neither of us works in the education field. My sole objective as a school board member is to obtain the best possible deal for the people of Croydon and their children. I have no intention of promoting the interests of "the system", its administration, or the status quo. As board member, I will answer to the taxpayers/parents of Croydon.
Please consider writing me in for Croydon School Board on March 11th.
My name is Jim Peschke, and I've been a resident of Croydon since November 2006. I am a parent of two small children. I would like to ask for your support as a write-in candidate for the Croydon School Board on March 11th.
Since I am new to Croydon, I'd like to explain my positions and motivation for running. The Croydon School board created a citizen's group tasked with addressing the arrangement we have with Newport. As an active member of this group, I've familiarized myself with the issues facing Croydon when this agreement expires in 2010. Any new agreement could be a boon or a bust for Croydon, and I'm determined to see things work in our favor.
My wife and I have been active in education reform since 2002. But let me be clear: Neither of us works in the education field. My sole objective as a school board member is to obtain the best possible deal for the people of Croydon and their children. I have no intention of promoting the interests of "the system", its administration, or the status quo. As board member, I will answer to the taxpayers/parents of Croydon.
Please consider writing me in for Croydon School Board on March 11th.
Teacher Union Facts
Before voting get the facts about the New Hampshire Teacher Unions. Teachers Union Facts is a project of The Center for Union Facts.
Today I went to vote with both of my children in tow. Right off the bat I was faced with a woman pushing me to write in George Caccavaro and in the end stated George is "for the kids." I knew right than that Jim had no chance as the education machine even in the small town of Croydon and SAU 43 was hard at work. I was not at all surprised to find out she worked for the schools. Jim spoke out about fiscal responsibility the night before at a the P.T.O. meeting at Croydon School. Of course teachers and school employees do not like that so the Croydon/Newport machine started up, teachers and parents were called to write-in George Caccavaro. The usual lies were told about Jim and I. There is no doubt that Jim will lose the election and a higher number of voters will turn out to write in George Caccavaro than the number of voters that seated last year's Croydon School Board member.
Today I went to vote with both of my children in tow. Right off the bat I was faced with a woman pushing me to write in George Caccavaro and in the end stated George is "for the kids." I knew right than that Jim had no chance as the education machine even in the small town of Croydon and SAU 43 was hard at work. I was not at all surprised to find out she worked for the schools. Jim spoke out about fiscal responsibility the night before at a the P.T.O. meeting at Croydon School. Of course teachers and school employees do not like that so the Croydon/Newport machine started up, teachers and parents were called to write-in George Caccavaro. The usual lies were told about Jim and I. There is no doubt that Jim will lose the election and a higher number of voters will turn out to write in George Caccavaro than the number of voters that seated last year's Croydon School Board member.
Know the facts before voting March 11
In this Argus Champion
article, SAU 43 Superintendent Bill Mealey serves as cheerleader for the March 11th budget vote. While there is no explicit statement of position, the article leaves little to the imagination.
Strikingly, the "80 percent committed to contractual obligations" is hardly given a passing thought. This is how the education establishment likes it. If voters gazed into the waste embodied in teacher contracts, health insurance, and other annual throwaways, they would reject the budget regardless of how frugal the remaining 20% might be.
Before accepting the sincerity of Mealey's invitation to the public, consider how a resident proposing a $1 million budget cut was received by the Superintendent at Newport's budget meeting.
If Mealey wants voters to be informed, perhaps voters would do well to consider how much could be saved with frugal open-shop non-tenured teacher contracts that reward results instead of birthdays.
Croydon voters be sure to tell our neighbors to the south to reject said budget. As the cost of sending our children to Newport Schools will increase our taxes at the end our current contract with Newport Schools. Our schools have a spending problem not a funding problem. Newport continues to have a decline in enrollment yet the cost of educating our children is out pacing the rate of inflation. This has to do with salaries far out pacing the rate of inflation and school employees refusing to take a larger responsibility for paying for their own benefits as those of us in the private sector have had to do over the past decade.
Know the facts before voting March 11
Bill Mealey
SAU 43 Superintendent
It certainly is the "Information Age." We have so much information to read, give and explore through many different sources. In the school business at this time of year, voters are given even more information so they can make an informed decision about the budget.
Everyone wants a fair budget that meets the needs of the students and results in the least tax impact for the voters. For school board members, administrators and staff, the process began last September when the guidelines for the budget process were developed. Then the administrators and staff went to work to examine the "must haves" and the "nice to haves" were discussed. A first draft of the budget was constructed and given to the SAU for further examination. The superintendent and business administrator questioned items, and made adjustments to the building budgets according to the guidelines set forth. The school boards scrutinized the budget along the way and were responsible for presenting the budget to the voters.
The budgets in SAU 43 are transparent. It is my belief that nothing should be hidden and that all items can be justified. The public is invited to all budget review sessions to ask questions and express alternative ideas. The budget hearing is designed to give voters an opportunity to participate in discussions about any part of the budget prior to a board vote. The deliberative session gives voters another opportunity to express their thoughts prior to putting the budget to a community vote. (This year in all SB2 New Hampshire school districts, the vote will take place Tuesday, March 11.) Personally, I am always hopeful that more people will take an interest in the process and participate more fully.
My urge to all of you is to ask questions, read the annual reports and get the facts before voting.
In most school budgets you will see 80 percent is committed to contractual obligations - salaries, health insurance, tuition reimbursement, professional development, building maintenance and obligations by law to our special education programs (in-district, early childhood support, and out-of district). Many cost items (debt service for a building program and teachers contractual obligations) were approved by voters in past year voting, and have a multiple year obligation, just like our home mortgage payments.
Some programs need further explanation, and early childhood support is one of them. This is a program that serves students ages 3 to 5, before they enter kindergarten. It is mandated by law. If a parent of a young child (or a doctor) observes that a child is having difficulties learning to walk/talk/think, or if the child has a medical issue or brain-based disability, the child can be referred to the early childhood support program for screening/evaluation. If the child is found eligible for services, the team works to help the child learn. At kindergarten age, the child is transitioned to school. There is a misconception that this is an "optional" program. It is not. Newport's program serves students from outside of the district. The communities then pay tuition for their resident children to Newport so they can receive service. The tuition paid by other districts can be found in the "revenue" section of the budget.
The revenue section of the budget is important. This section of the budget tells you what revenue there is to offset certain programs. Early childhood support is only one. You can see federal grant monies offset positions and programs. Monies from the state for a building bond can be found in the revenue section. The Croydon School District has an "area agreement" to send their students from grades 4 to 12 to the Newport School District, and the tuition payment can be found in the revenue.
The bottom line is your tax rate is calculated by taking your expenditures and subtracting your revenue. What is left is the amount taxed. , In the end, the districts are looking for the voters to support what is believed to be an effective learning program and a safe environment for all of our students. Since such a large part of the budget is already dedicated to staff and facilities, if the school board needs to cut, the only place to find monies is in staff and programs (examples are course options, athletics, etc.).
The voting date is March 11. If you need more information, please be sure you have a copy of the annual report from your district. In Sunapee and Croydon, the annual reports are mailed to every community household. In Newport, the annual reports are distributed at the deliberative session.
If you did not receive a report, you may obtain one from the SAU 43 office, borrow one from the Richards Free Library, or go to any of the school libraries. Call 863-3540 if you have questions.
article, SAU 43 Superintendent Bill Mealey serves as cheerleader for the March 11th budget vote. While there is no explicit statement of position, the article leaves little to the imagination.
Strikingly, the "80 percent committed to contractual obligations" is hardly given a passing thought. This is how the education establishment likes it. If voters gazed into the waste embodied in teacher contracts, health insurance, and other annual throwaways, they would reject the budget regardless of how frugal the remaining 20% might be.
Before accepting the sincerity of Mealey's invitation to the public, consider how a resident proposing a $1 million budget cut was received by the Superintendent at Newport's budget meeting.
If Mealey wants voters to be informed, perhaps voters would do well to consider how much could be saved with frugal open-shop non-tenured teacher contracts that reward results instead of birthdays.
Croydon voters be sure to tell our neighbors to the south to reject said budget. As the cost of sending our children to Newport Schools will increase our taxes at the end our current contract with Newport Schools. Our schools have a spending problem not a funding problem. Newport continues to have a decline in enrollment yet the cost of educating our children is out pacing the rate of inflation. This has to do with salaries far out pacing the rate of inflation and school employees refusing to take a larger responsibility for paying for their own benefits as those of us in the private sector have had to do over the past decade.
Know the facts before voting March 11
Bill Mealey
SAU 43 Superintendent
It certainly is the "Information Age." We have so much information to read, give and explore through many different sources. In the school business at this time of year, voters are given even more information so they can make an informed decision about the budget.
Everyone wants a fair budget that meets the needs of the students and results in the least tax impact for the voters. For school board members, administrators and staff, the process began last September when the guidelines for the budget process were developed. Then the administrators and staff went to work to examine the "must haves" and the "nice to haves" were discussed. A first draft of the budget was constructed and given to the SAU for further examination. The superintendent and business administrator questioned items, and made adjustments to the building budgets according to the guidelines set forth. The school boards scrutinized the budget along the way and were responsible for presenting the budget to the voters.
The budgets in SAU 43 are transparent. It is my belief that nothing should be hidden and that all items can be justified. The public is invited to all budget review sessions to ask questions and express alternative ideas. The budget hearing is designed to give voters an opportunity to participate in discussions about any part of the budget prior to a board vote. The deliberative session gives voters another opportunity to express their thoughts prior to putting the budget to a community vote. (This year in all SB2 New Hampshire school districts, the vote will take place Tuesday, March 11.) Personally, I am always hopeful that more people will take an interest in the process and participate more fully.
My urge to all of you is to ask questions, read the annual reports and get the facts before voting.
In most school budgets you will see 80 percent is committed to contractual obligations - salaries, health insurance, tuition reimbursement, professional development, building maintenance and obligations by law to our special education programs (in-district, early childhood support, and out-of district). Many cost items (debt service for a building program and teachers contractual obligations) were approved by voters in past year voting, and have a multiple year obligation, just like our home mortgage payments.
Some programs need further explanation, and early childhood support is one of them. This is a program that serves students ages 3 to 5, before they enter kindergarten. It is mandated by law. If a parent of a young child (or a doctor) observes that a child is having difficulties learning to walk/talk/think, or if the child has a medical issue or brain-based disability, the child can be referred to the early childhood support program for screening/evaluation. If the child is found eligible for services, the team works to help the child learn. At kindergarten age, the child is transitioned to school. There is a misconception that this is an "optional" program. It is not. Newport's program serves students from outside of the district. The communities then pay tuition for their resident children to Newport so they can receive service. The tuition paid by other districts can be found in the "revenue" section of the budget.
The revenue section of the budget is important. This section of the budget tells you what revenue there is to offset certain programs. Early childhood support is only one. You can see federal grant monies offset positions and programs. Monies from the state for a building bond can be found in the revenue section. The Croydon School District has an "area agreement" to send their students from grades 4 to 12 to the Newport School District, and the tuition payment can be found in the revenue.
The bottom line is your tax rate is calculated by taking your expenditures and subtracting your revenue. What is left is the amount taxed. , In the end, the districts are looking for the voters to support what is believed to be an effective learning program and a safe environment for all of our students. Since such a large part of the budget is already dedicated to staff and facilities, if the school board needs to cut, the only place to find monies is in staff and programs (examples are course options, athletics, etc.).
The voting date is March 11. If you need more information, please be sure you have a copy of the annual report from your district. In Sunapee and Croydon, the annual reports are mailed to every community household. In Newport, the annual reports are distributed at the deliberative session.
If you did not receive a report, you may obtain one from the SAU 43 office, borrow one from the Richards Free Library, or go to any of the school libraries. Call 863-3540 if you have questions.
Monday, March 10, 2008
Questions to ask yourself before supporting any tax warrant.
Our government and government schools have a spending problem and not a funding problem. We continue to see reduced productivity, deficit spending, debt, guaranteed pensions far exceeding social security, salary increases exceeding the rate of inflation and benefits far exceeding those of us in the private sector that pay these benefits for our government/school employees.
Here are some questions to ask before voting on any education warrants and tax increases.
1. Can I afford an increase in my rent or property taxes?
2. Do I have credit card debt that should be paid off first?
3. Do I have six months salary in my savings account to live off of, if I lose my job?
4. Do I save 10% of my salary each month for my retirement?
5. Am I saving enough money for my children's college education?
6. When I retire my spouse and I will need between $500,000 - 1,000,000 when we retire to live for the next 30 years. Do we have at least 500,000.00 dollars in our retirement account? (This assumes that you are not a state, city, county or school employee with a guaranteed pension that is a percentage of your 3 highest years salary.)
7. Can I continue to afford this warrant if it does pass, because as my assessment increases so will the amount that I pay for the warrant each year?
8. Do I want to put my house at risk for foreclosure?
Here are some questions to ask your school boards, administrators and teachers before voting.
1. How will you balance the budget if the warrant fails?
2. Why is the cost of education going up as much as 10 times faster than the cost of living?
3. Some teachers and administrators are receiving salary increases far exceeding the rate of inflation. How do you expect people in the community to afford the warrant when their salaries went up 3% if they got a raise or 2.1% if they are on social security?
4. 15% of the population does not have health insurance and the rest of the working population pays on average 22% of their own insurance and as much as 100% of their families' premiums. What percentage of their insurance premiums do teachers and administrators pay for themselves and their families?
5. If the warrant does pass do you promise to balance the budget and never come again to the public for another tax warrant?
6. If you plan on coming to us again for a warrant when will that be?
7. Does this plan to spend more money include class size reduction? If so do the teachers plan to take a proportionate pay cut for the reduction in workload?
8. Why do teacher salaries and administrative salaries increase at a rate far above the CPI?
9. Are your unions or associations trying to raise our state taxes as well as our property taxes?
10. If a warrant passes, when will we see our property taxes increased?
11. If asking for a building warrant when do you planning to come to us with an education warrant to staff the new building.
Here are some questions to ask before voting on any education warrants and tax increases.
1. Can I afford an increase in my rent or property taxes?
2. Do I have credit card debt that should be paid off first?
3. Do I have six months salary in my savings account to live off of, if I lose my job?
4. Do I save 10% of my salary each month for my retirement?
5. Am I saving enough money for my children's college education?
6. When I retire my spouse and I will need between $500,000 - 1,000,000 when we retire to live for the next 30 years. Do we have at least 500,000.00 dollars in our retirement account? (This assumes that you are not a state, city, county or school employee with a guaranteed pension that is a percentage of your 3 highest years salary.)
7. Can I continue to afford this warrant if it does pass, because as my assessment increases so will the amount that I pay for the warrant each year?
8. Do I want to put my house at risk for foreclosure?
Here are some questions to ask your school boards, administrators and teachers before voting.
1. How will you balance the budget if the warrant fails?
2. Why is the cost of education going up as much as 10 times faster than the cost of living?
3. Some teachers and administrators are receiving salary increases far exceeding the rate of inflation. How do you expect people in the community to afford the warrant when their salaries went up 3% if they got a raise or 2.1% if they are on social security?
4. 15% of the population does not have health insurance and the rest of the working population pays on average 22% of their own insurance and as much as 100% of their families' premiums. What percentage of their insurance premiums do teachers and administrators pay for themselves and their families?
5. If the warrant does pass do you promise to balance the budget and never come again to the public for another tax warrant?
6. If you plan on coming to us again for a warrant when will that be?
7. Does this plan to spend more money include class size reduction? If so do the teachers plan to take a proportionate pay cut for the reduction in workload?
8. Why do teacher salaries and administrative salaries increase at a rate far above the CPI?
9. Are your unions or associations trying to raise our state taxes as well as our property taxes?
10. If a warrant passes, when will we see our property taxes increased?
11. If asking for a building warrant when do you planning to come to us with an education warrant to staff the new building.
Saturday, March 1, 2008
New Hampshire Citizen.org
With the elections coming up educating yourself before any vote is your most important weapon against further tax increases and protecting your hard earned dollars for your own retirement and children's college education. Today we would like to highlight New Hampshire Citizen.org
as a source of information for protecting your hard earned dollars.
There is no such thing as a good tax. - Winston Churchill
The avoidance of taxes is the only intellectual pursuit that carries any reward. - John Maynard Keynes
Taxation with representation ain't so hot either. ~Gerald Barzan
America is a land of taxation that was founded to avoid taxation. ~Laurence J. Peter
Did you ever notice that when you put the words "The" and "IRS" together, it spells "THEIRS?" ~Author Unknown
There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. - Robert A. Heinlein
as a source of information for protecting your hard earned dollars.
There is no such thing as a good tax. - Winston Churchill
The avoidance of taxes is the only intellectual pursuit that carries any reward. - John Maynard Keynes
Taxation with representation ain't so hot either. ~Gerald Barzan
America is a land of taxation that was founded to avoid taxation. ~Laurence J. Peter
Did you ever notice that when you put the words "The" and "IRS" together, it spells "THEIRS?" ~Author Unknown
There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. - Robert A. Heinlein
Friday, February 29, 2008
'Donor towns' are part of new education bill
The following article appeared in the Union Leader.
This is socialism, if our legislators cared about the education of our children they would not be pandering to the government school employees. Education tax dollars should follow the child not the institution and education control should be kept at the local level not the state level where educrats only have to go to one source (the legislators) instead of the people of their community to request more dollars to satisfy their greed. Public schools are government schools and just like the government their is massive corruption and waste of our tax dollars.
For another source about this bill visit nhcitizen.org
'Donor towns' are part of new education bill
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Friday, Feb. 29, 2008
CONCORD – A $914 million school funding plan was unveiled Thursday that also would create a new, separate aid program for the poorest towns to mitigate aid losses under the new formula.
The property-poor towns could share another $50 million to $60 million. Details on the distribution are still being worked out, but many would lose aid otherwise, said state Sen. Iris Estabrook, the plan's prime sponsor.
"This is not adequacy aid and will be to the discretion of the Legislature where the rest is not," Senate Majority Leader Joseph Foster, a co-sponsor, said of the new aid program.
Estabrook based the basic school aid plan largely on recommendations by the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Costing an Adequate Education that tied funding to education policy, not a community's property wealth as current law does. A hearing on the plan is Tuesday.
Property wealth was left out of the committee's deliberations, but now will become part of the debate over whether the plan does what it is supposed to do - help communities provide an adequate education.
Besides costing poor towns money, the basic distribution formula would require more than three dozen property wealthy communities to send $16 million to the state for redistribution. Wealthy towns have fought just as hard against being "donor" towns over the years as poor towns have fought to get more aid.
The plan is the latest in a long series of attempts to comply with a state Supreme Court mandate. The court has repeatedly ruled that the state must define an adequate education, determine its cost, pay for it and hold school districts accountable for delivering it.
The Legislature defined adequacy last spring and the joint committee worked for months on determining its cost. The committee released its report Feb. 1, but did not come up with a final cost.
Estabrook's plan would distribute $3,450 in base per pupil aid to every town - about $675 million of the $914 million. The rest would be distributed as targeted aid to the poorest schools and for non-English speaking students and those with disabilities.
The plan sets the base per pupil aid amount by using average salaries for teachers, principals, guidance counselors, administrative assistants, library media specialists, technology coordinators and custodians. It assigns a dollar value for each based on class, school or district size. A dollar value also was added for specialty teachers for programs such as art and music.
A dollar value also was added for instructional materials, computers, professional development, facilities and maintenance, and transportation.
It would use a series of thresholds to determine which schools had the highest concentration of poor kids to qualify for additional aid. The aid would be distributed based on the school's total population instead of just extra money for every poor child. The plan provides up to double the base aid amount to schools and basing poverty on the number who sign up for free or reduced price school lunches.
The plan also would distribute $675 per non-English speaking pupil. Schools would get $1,798 in additional aid for disabled students getting extra help but who remain in the classroom. They would get $3,610 more for disabled students taught in self-contained classrooms.
The plan requires that the needy schools spend the extra aid on state-approved services, such as full-day kindergarten, reduced class size or after-school homework help.
The aid plan would not take effect until the 2009-2010 school year.
Another Senate bill would give school districts an extra year before requiring them to offer kindergarten. The Legislature included public kindergarten as a requirement for all schools in the definition of an adequate education. The law gives the 11 districts without kindergarten until September 2008 to offer programs. The bill includes money for temporary classrooms for three years.
The Senate has a March 20 deadline to send bills to the House. If the Senate passes it, the House would have until May 15 to act on it. Lawmakers hope to adjourn on June. 5.
Meanwhile, the Senate last week sent the House a proposed constitutional change that would mean yet another rewrite of the school aid system if voters approved it. The amendment would let the state single out the neediest towns for school aid. Gov. John Lynch has lobbied hard for the amendment.
Lynch and amendment supporters believe the state should send all or most aid to the poorest towns -- which means towns in the middle and upper end of the property wealth spectrum would get little or no money.
"To put in place the best possible education policy, the state must be able to consider the fiscal capacity of communities when distributing state education aid. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has said we cannot do that. The result is a plan like this one, which takes aid from the most needy school districts," Lynch said of Estabrook's plan.In repeated rulings, the court has said the state can't do that. The court said the state must pay for what it determines an adequate education costs. The court also said the state can provide more aid on top of adequacy.Total state aid has remained unchanged for a decade despite rising school costs. The state currently distributes $897 million in aid with the state property tax contributing 40 percent.
This is socialism, if our legislators cared about the education of our children they would not be pandering to the government school employees. Education tax dollars should follow the child not the institution and education control should be kept at the local level not the state level where educrats only have to go to one source (the legislators) instead of the people of their community to request more dollars to satisfy their greed. Public schools are government schools and just like the government their is massive corruption and waste of our tax dollars.
For another source about this bill visit nhcitizen.org
'Donor towns' are part of new education bill
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Friday, Feb. 29, 2008
CONCORD – A $914 million school funding plan was unveiled Thursday that also would create a new, separate aid program for the poorest towns to mitigate aid losses under the new formula.
The property-poor towns could share another $50 million to $60 million. Details on the distribution are still being worked out, but many would lose aid otherwise, said state Sen. Iris Estabrook, the plan's prime sponsor.
"This is not adequacy aid and will be to the discretion of the Legislature where the rest is not," Senate Majority Leader Joseph Foster, a co-sponsor, said of the new aid program.
Estabrook based the basic school aid plan largely on recommendations by the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Costing an Adequate Education that tied funding to education policy, not a community's property wealth as current law does. A hearing on the plan is Tuesday.
Property wealth was left out of the committee's deliberations, but now will become part of the debate over whether the plan does what it is supposed to do - help communities provide an adequate education.
Besides costing poor towns money, the basic distribution formula would require more than three dozen property wealthy communities to send $16 million to the state for redistribution. Wealthy towns have fought just as hard against being "donor" towns over the years as poor towns have fought to get more aid.
The plan is the latest in a long series of attempts to comply with a state Supreme Court mandate. The court has repeatedly ruled that the state must define an adequate education, determine its cost, pay for it and hold school districts accountable for delivering it.
The Legislature defined adequacy last spring and the joint committee worked for months on determining its cost. The committee released its report Feb. 1, but did not come up with a final cost.
Estabrook's plan would distribute $3,450 in base per pupil aid to every town - about $675 million of the $914 million. The rest would be distributed as targeted aid to the poorest schools and for non-English speaking students and those with disabilities.
The plan sets the base per pupil aid amount by using average salaries for teachers, principals, guidance counselors, administrative assistants, library media specialists, technology coordinators and custodians. It assigns a dollar value for each based on class, school or district size. A dollar value also was added for specialty teachers for programs such as art and music.
A dollar value also was added for instructional materials, computers, professional development, facilities and maintenance, and transportation.
It would use a series of thresholds to determine which schools had the highest concentration of poor kids to qualify for additional aid. The aid would be distributed based on the school's total population instead of just extra money for every poor child. The plan provides up to double the base aid amount to schools and basing poverty on the number who sign up for free or reduced price school lunches.
The plan also would distribute $675 per non-English speaking pupil. Schools would get $1,798 in additional aid for disabled students getting extra help but who remain in the classroom. They would get $3,610 more for disabled students taught in self-contained classrooms.
The plan requires that the needy schools spend the extra aid on state-approved services, such as full-day kindergarten, reduced class size or after-school homework help.
The aid plan would not take effect until the 2009-2010 school year.
Another Senate bill would give school districts an extra year before requiring them to offer kindergarten. The Legislature included public kindergarten as a requirement for all schools in the definition of an adequate education. The law gives the 11 districts without kindergarten until September 2008 to offer programs. The bill includes money for temporary classrooms for three years.
The Senate has a March 20 deadline to send bills to the House. If the Senate passes it, the House would have until May 15 to act on it. Lawmakers hope to adjourn on June. 5.
Meanwhile, the Senate last week sent the House a proposed constitutional change that would mean yet another rewrite of the school aid system if voters approved it. The amendment would let the state single out the neediest towns for school aid. Gov. John Lynch has lobbied hard for the amendment.
Lynch and amendment supporters believe the state should send all or most aid to the poorest towns -- which means towns in the middle and upper end of the property wealth spectrum would get little or no money.
"To put in place the best possible education policy, the state must be able to consider the fiscal capacity of communities when distributing state education aid. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has said we cannot do that. The result is a plan like this one, which takes aid from the most needy school districts," Lynch said of Estabrook's plan.In repeated rulings, the court has said the state can't do that. The court said the state must pay for what it determines an adequate education costs. The court also said the state can provide more aid on top of adequacy.Total state aid has remained unchanged for a decade despite rising school costs. The state currently distributes $897 million in aid with the state property tax contributing 40 percent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)