Support Croydon's School Choice Program | School Choice for New Hampshire
Please sign the petition.
Cathy
"Do you think nobody would willingly entrust his children to you or pay you for teaching them? Why do you have to extort your fees and collect your pupils by compulsion?" - Isabel Paterson "A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." - George Santayana
Saturday, November 7, 2015
Thursday, November 5, 2015
Free Boob Jobs for Teachers & Other K-12 Clusterf*cks
"They're not interested in high quality education for children, what they're interested in is protecting their turf." A perfect example of what the AG's office, some of the bullies in Croydon, and some of the bullies in Newport are doing to the five children attending the Montessori school.
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
School Choice vs Education Choice
The following piece appears on the Heartland.org. website.
Click the link to listen to the Podcast.
Cathy
In today’s edition of The Heartland Daily Podcast, Lennie Jarratt, project manager for education at the Heartland Institute, joins host Donald Kendal to discuss, among other topics, the difference between school choice and education choice.
Often when discussing school reform, several potential solutions are suggested. Some of these solutions include Educational Savings Accounts (ESAs), Vouchers, Income Tax Credits, Parent Trigger, ect. Linked here is a great resource that serves to detail some of these programs. Jarratt helps to explain how these solutions fit into the bigger picture of creating a school system not dominated by the government.
Jarratt and Kendal also discuss Common Core and how it originated. Jarratt describes why conservatives are skeptical of these national standards and elaborates on how they have the potential to become really dangerous.
[Please subscribe to the Heartland Daily Podcast for free at this link.]
Click the link to listen to the Podcast.
Cathy
Heartland Daily Podcast – Lennie Jarratt: School Choice v. Education Choice
- by Donald Kendal
- October 27, 2015
In today’s edition of The Heartland Daily Podcast, Lennie Jarratt, project manager for education at the Heartland Institute, joins host Donald Kendal to discuss, among other topics, the difference between school choice and education choice.
Often when discussing school reform, several potential solutions are suggested. Some of these solutions include Educational Savings Accounts (ESAs), Vouchers, Income Tax Credits, Parent Trigger, ect. Linked here is a great resource that serves to detail some of these programs. Jarratt helps to explain how these solutions fit into the bigger picture of creating a school system not dominated by the government.
Jarratt and Kendal also discuss Common Core and how it originated. Jarratt describes why conservatives are skeptical of these national standards and elaborates on how they have the potential to become really dangerous.
[Please subscribe to the Heartland Daily Podcast for free at this link.]
Friday, October 23, 2015
My Turn: School choice works for Croydon students via the Concord Monitor
My Turn: School choice works for Croydon students
By BILL WALKER
For the Monitor
Thursday, October 22, 2015
(Published in print: Friday, October 23, 2015)
For the Monitor
Thursday, October 22, 2015
(Published in print: Friday, October 23, 2015)
In the 2014-2015 school year, New Hampshire taxpayers spent $17,233.48 for every student in public elementary and secondary education.
This is more than most private schools in New Hampshire charge. But it isn’t enough. It will never be enough. We could raise school spending until we are spending approximately $30,000 per student, as Washington, D.C., does. We could spend a million dollars per student, and it still won’t be enough . . . until we let children learn in their different ways. No single cage, no matter how gold-plated the bars, is the right place for all minds.
The necessity of choice is shown by this: The enemies of choice for your children send their own children to private schools.
Gov. Hassan’s children went to private
school. Obama’s children go to private school. A long list of
anti-choice senators, congressmen, governors and mayors have their own
children in private schools.
Educators themselves support choice for
their own children. In Philadelphia, 44 percent of the public-school
teachers send their own children to private school at their own expense.
The figures are disproportionately high for educators in other major
cities.
This is because educators know about
education. Education isn’t something that is done to you; it is
something you do yourself. In the modern world, no one is looking for
regimented drones to turn a bolt on an assembly line.
The ability to create your own projects
and the persistence to finish them are the ingredients for success.
Those abilities can be developed in many different ways: online
education, immersive language courses, travel, art, music, robotics. All
modern educational roads lead to individual journeys conducted at
individual speeds. The idea that most children should be condemned to
rote learning of one national curriculum, taught at one tedious speed,
doesn’t belong in the 21st century.
So the obvious question is: shouldn’t
public-school families have access to the best schools for their
children, especially when it would cost less than our current failing
system? Authors from Milton Friedman to Elizabeth Warren have asked this
question for decades.
To the parents and school board of
Croydon, there seemed to be a simple win-win answer. In 2012 they voted
to provide access to whatever school best fit their children. Parents in
Croydon have had choices for the last two school years.
Most Croydon parents this year chose
public middle and high school in nearby Newport. A few chose to send
five children to a private Montessori school. The cost is $8,200 per
Montessori student. This is less than half the average cost of a New
Hampshire public education. But the value to the children and the
parents is immeasurable. Access to alternative teaching methods can mean
the difference between success and failure, between a lifelong love of
learning or the permanent dulling of a creative mind.
The response of the New Hampshire
Education Department to the success of the Croydon program has been fear
and hostility. Education Commissioner Virginia Barry had Associate
Attorney General Anne Edwards send the town a cease-and-desist letter.
The state has actually demanded that children be pulled out of their
schools in the middle of their school year!
Croydon has naturally refused to disrupt
the lives of their children. The town isn’t going without a fight,
either. They geared up to take on the state’s legal threats with a
crowdfunding site. Croydon’s lawyer is former state Supreme Court
Justice Charles Douglas.
All these legal fireworks make little
sense, even apart from their destructive effect on education. The larger
and richer towns in New Hampshire have been sending their children to
private schools for decades. Pinkerton Academy in Derry is a prominent
example.
New Hampshire has a long tradition of flexibility in education.
We have had interstate school districts
since the early 1960s. Orford is part of Rivendell, serving towns in
Vermont and New Hampshire. If we can cooperate with Eriador, why is it
so hard to cooperate with a Montessori school in our own state? Is our
public education funding actually focused on serving each individual
child, or is it just a jobs program for bureaucrats?
Is launching a huge legal battle to drag five happy children out of their chosen school the best use of our education tax money?
(Bill Walker is a member of the Sullivan County Republican Committee.)
Thursday, October 22, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)