Friday, October 31, 2008

Argh...the more I read I just can not understand why people support Barack Obama.

Okay, I am officially obsessed with this election. I am a news/political junkie and I think my husband is going to conduct an intervention soon. Yes I have hi-jacked our Citizens for Reasonable And Fair Taxes website as my own pulpit as of late. But I maintain it is Obama's stance on taxes that allows me to do so as we are Citizens for Reasonable And Fair Taxes.

I know some people who are supporting Obama some people I can have a discussion about the issues some people I can not. I read articles on the left, articles on the right and articles in the middle about the election. The past two days I heard an Obama ad on the radio that I thought was very persuasive at attracting the New Hampshire voter assuming that New Hampshire voter was limited in his/her presidential research. In fact it made Obama sound like he was raised with middle America beliefs and believed in hard work like so many Americans, but this just is not true. I just could not believe the audacity and pandering of the ad.

With all of the following how can anyone vote for this man? The only conclusion I can come up with is they are just ignorant to the extent of this man's beliefs, connections, bias of the MSM and the corruption surrounding his campaign.

I would really like to hear from Obama supporters how they rationalize the following they appear in no particular order. All questions are accompanied sources from left, right and middle.

The truth about taxes, fact checks on taxes


Why the mortgage crisis really happened.


Can you trust a man who lies even before the presidential candidates were declared? Obama's flip on public campaign financing.


What will happen to your privacy under Obama? Dare to be a women who is not a democrat and get your email hacked. Dare to be someone like Joe the Plumber asking a legitimate questions to Obama and get your privacy violated by state employees.

How do you turn a blind eye to Acorn? The right to vote is sacred in my book. Are you okay with a man whose followers steal elections?

The main stream media is in the tank for Obama and Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?

Okay I am a proud American and frankly I do think there are Americans who are not proud to be called an American.

Is Barack even a citizen? Someone bought this up at the Sarah Palin rally. Frankly I brushed it off but enough people bought it up I felt the need to investigate the matter further.

How Obama feels about your right to bear arms.



Doesn't it bother you that Obama is a Marxist? Maybe schools have been successful at pushing their agenda and people and indeed do not care that he is a Marxist. "How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." Ronald Reagan

Charity starts at home. Charity starts at home. Will he take care of Americans as well as he takes care of family?


The Fairness Doctrine will be reinstated under Obama this will eliminate much of the right bloggers and conservative talk show hosts. "Fairness Doctrine’ Is A Code Name For “Censorship"


Finally for Catholics out there, heck for human beings in general how do you rationalize Barack Obama and his stance on Born Alive Infants Protection Program.


I could continue on forever but I will leave it here and step off my soap box. If in spite of all this someone still votes for Obama they are doing it fully educated but I will never understand why.


My mother and father taught me there is no shame in working hard no matter the job. I can take care of myself and my family. I will be supporting McCain and Palin as they share my values. No thank you Obama I do not need a handout. Those who have worked hard for their money should keep it and give through charity if they want to share their wealth.

Cathy

BornAliveTruth.orgBornAliveTruth.org



A perfect storm and why a Obama presidency would be Catastrophic



I am a huge fan of Thomas Sowell. The following article can be found in a number of places.

Cathy

A perfect storm

By Thomas Sowell

Some elections are routine, some are important and some are historic. If Senator John McCain wins this election, it will probably go down in history as routine. But if Senator Barack Obama wins, it is more likely to be historic— and catastrophic.

Once the election is over, the glittering generalities of rhetoric and style will mean nothing. Everything will depend on performance in facing huge challenges, domestic and foreign.

Performance is where Barack Obama has nothing to show for his political career, either in Illinois or in Washington.

Policies that he proposes under the banner of "change" are almost all policies that have been tried repeatedly in other countries— and failed repeatedly in other countries.

Politicians telling businesses how to operate? That's been tried in countries around the world, especially during the second half of the 20th century. It has failed so often and so badly that even socialist and communist governments were freeing up their markets by the end of the century.

The economies of China and India began their take-off into high rates of growth when they got rid of precisely the kinds of policies that Obama is advocating for the United States under the magic mantra of "change."

Putting restrictions on international trade in order to save jobs at home? That was tried here with the Hawley-Smoot tariff during the Great Depression.

Unemployment was 9 percent when that tariff was passed to save jobs, but unemployment went up instead of down, and reached 25 percent before the decade was over.

Higher taxes to "spread the well around," as Obama puts it? The idea of redistributing wealth has turned into the reality of redistributing poverty, in countries where wealth has fled and the production of new wealth has been stifled by a lack of incentives.

Economic disasters, however, may pale by comparison with the catastrophe of Iran with nuclear weapons. Glib rhetoric about Iran being "a small country," as Obama called it, will be a bitter irony for Americans who will have to live in the shadow of a nuclear threat that cannot be deterred, as that of the Soviet Union could be, by the threat of a nuclear counter-attack.

Suicidal fanatics cannot be deterred. If they are willing to die and we are not, then we are at their mercy— and they have no mercy. Moreover, once they get nuclear weapons, that is a situation which cannot be reversed, either in this generation or in generations to come.

Is this the legacy we wish to leave our children and grandchildren, by voting on the basis of style and symbolism, rather than substance?

If Barack Obama thinks that such a catastrophe can be avoided by sitting down and talking with the leaders of Iran, then he is repeating a fallacy that helped bring on World War II.

In a nuclear age, one country does not have to send troops to occupy another country in order to conquer it. A country is conquered if another country can dictate who rules it, as the Mongols once did with Russia, and as Osama bin Laden tried to do when he threatened retaliation against places in the United States that voted for George W. Bush. But he didn't have nuclear weapons to back up that threat— yet.

America has never been a conquered country, so it may be very hard for most Americans even to conceive what that can mean. After France was conquered in 1940, it was reduced to turning over some of its own innocent citizens to the Nazis to kill, just because those citizens were Jewish.

Do you think our leaders wouldn't do that? Not even if the alternative was to see New York and Los Angeles go up in mushroom clouds? If I were Jewish, I wouldn't bet my life on that.

What the Middle East fanatics want is not just our resources or even our lives, but our humiliation first, in whatever sadistic ways they can think of. Their lust for humiliation has already been repeatedly demonstrated in their videotaped beheadings that find such an eager market in the Middle East.

None of this can be prevented by glib talk, but only by character, courage and decisive actions— none of which Barack Obama has ever demonstrated.


Thursday, October 30, 2008

Vote YES on 1! End the Massachusetts Income Tax!

I occasionally have a few readers from Massachusetts so I am posting this on our site. The other reason I am posting it on this site is because if the Democrats manage to get an income tax passed here in New Hampshire the following will give you a peek into where spending will go and how we may have to fight to end an income tax here in New Hampshire down the line. The best thing to do is to cut spending now in New Hampshire and never allow an income tax to pass in New Hampshire.

I received the following from Small Government News.

Cathy

Small Government News*
Thursday, October 30, 2008

Vote YES on 1! End the Massachusetts Income Tax!

Publisher: Carla Howell
Editor: Michael Cloud

===========================================================
IN THIS ISSUE
===========================================================

- Why Are the Teachers Unions Ignoring, Denying, and Refusing to Cut These Billions of Dollars in Massachusetts Government Waste?
- At-a-Glance Comparison: Government Worker Retirement VS. Private Sector Worker Retirement
- Documentation and Sources for Some of the Government Waste


===========================================================
WHY ARE THE TEACHERS UNIONS IGNORING, DENYING, AND REFUSING TO CUT THESE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNMENT WASTE?
By Michael Cloud and Carla Howell
===========================================================

Government Waste Causes Your High Taxes.

Yet the Teachers Unions and their anti-Question 1 allies refuse to acknowledge or address the billions and billions of dollars in Massachusetts government waste.

The Teachers Unions are trying to terrorize voters with visions of 40% to 80% layoffs and shut downs of police, fire fighters, ambulances, 9-1-1 emergency services, and other highly-prized government personnel and services.

The Teachers Unions know full well that Question 1 will simply cut state government spending from $47 billion to $35 billion – our 1999 level.

Teachers Unions are praying you’ll never learn that 36% of the combined $70 billion in city, town and state government spending fully funds all of these government services at their current level:
· public schools
· road construction, repair and maintenance
· colleges and universities
· police officers
· fire fighters
· 9-1-1 emergency services
· snow plowing
· trash pick-up
· payments on the state government’s debt
· lottery prize winnings
· courts
· prisons
· and all constitutionally-mandated offices

…with a few bucks left over for graft and patronage.

All of these services are funded at 100% of today’s level with only 36% of Massachusetts government spending.

So why are the Teachers Unions and their allies threatening your family with firing and shutting down these essential services?

Remember the story of the baby and the dirty bathwater? (http://tinyurl.com/5jdcyb )

Why are the Teachers Unions campaigning against Ballot Question 1 by threatening to hurt the baby?

Why are they ferociously opposing our proposal to throw out ONLY the dirty bathwater?

Again and again, opposition spokespeople – led by the husband of Rosanne Bacon Meade, former President of the Massachusetts Teachers Association - claim,

“Carla Howell and the supporters of Ballot Question 1 can’t even show us $2 billion in waste in state government spending.”

Again and again, we cite billions and billions in government waste.

But they seem to suffer from Government Waste Amnesia – and raise their discredited challenge at the next debate.

Once again, here’s a partial list of Massachusetts government waste.

Because the Massachusetts state government refuses to "Show You the Tax Money," refuses to open the books on government finances, this list of state government waste is only the tip of the garbage heap.

All of the information was exposed by Massachusetts newspapers - who sometimes get access to income and spending numbers.

Here's a partial list of Massachusetts state government waste we would cut – while ENDing the state income tax:

* $138.7 million tax subsidy to millionaire movie stars and millionaire movie directors.

* $1 billion in tax subsidies to multi-billion dollar bio-tech pharmaceutical corporations – to bring more of them to Massachusetts. ($100 million paid each year for 10 years.)

* $2.55 billion MORE waste added this year to the retirement pay for retired state government employees. Despite the fact that they get twice to three times the retirement income of private sector retirees. Despite the fact that government employees retire 13 years younger than private sector retirees. Who’s forced to pay the $2.55 billion increase? You and your co-workers. Private sector taxpayers.

* $3 billion to $6 billion waste per year in retirement pay - excessive and outrageous over-payment - to retired state government employees, city and town government employees, and public school teachers and other school employees. We can and we should engage in good faith re-negotiations of the terms and money of all government employee pensions - and give back the outrageous overcharges to taxpayers.

* $330 million waste and overpayment to toll collectors. $70,000 a year paid to toll collectors – plus plush benefits. Plus full retirement pay of $50,000 a year at age 54. For unskilled labor – counting and making change – that require only a 5th grade education. Cut toll booth collector pay in half – to $35,000 a year. Give back the $15 million a year excess pay to taxpayers. And give back the $315 million in excessive retirement pay - caused by the $35,000 in overpayment each year for toll collectors.

* $200 million high school being built in Newton, Massachusetts. A large fraction funded out of the state government budget.

* $300 million to $600 million worth of unnecessary, over-built, and overpriced local public school construction in the just the last few years – hundreds of millions of dollars out of the taxes we pay to the state government.

* $80 million to $100 million a year in overpayment, excess, and waste for road safety flaggers by Massachusetts town, city, and state governments.

This is just the tip of the garbage heap.

We must open the government’s books. Expose all the nitty-gritty government waste. The sheer embarrassment of it will force the legislature to announce billions of dollars in immediate cuts.

What's worse than government waste?

Financing government waste.

Paying interest and finance fees on government waste.

Every billion dollars of government waste that gets financed by tax bonds ends up costing taxpayers an additional billion dollars.

Waste Financed is Waste Doubled. And the tax costs doubled.

Proof? The Big Dig: the over-promised, under-delivered, massively wasteful government construction project. The Big Dig proves that waste financed doubles the cost of the waste. The Massachusetts state government still owes $13.83 billion for the Big Dig. $6.81 billion of the debt is for the construction – and $7.02 billion is for finance charges and interest!

Teachers Unions and other government unions directly profit from protecting and promoting government waste.

Government waste causes high taxes.

Cutting government waste cuts your taxes.

Cutting taxes promotes cutting government waste.

Help us cut Massachusetts government waste.

Please make a donation right now so we can WIN the vote on November 4th, get rid of billions and billions of dollars in government waste -- and END the state income tax:

https://www.savyon.com/ms/sga/sga2.php


===========================================================
At-a-Glance Comparison: Government Worker Retirement VS. Private Sector Worker Retirement
===========================================================

Why haven't you been told these things about Massachusetts government employee retirement packages?

Click and glance: http://tinyurl.com/6e3hxl


===========================================================
DOCUMENTATION AND SOURCES FOR SOME OF THE GOVERNMENT WASTE
===========================================================

Safety Flagger Waste:

http://tinyurl.com/58e3xv

http://tinyurl.com/5w2k2x

http://tinyurl.com/5dpwg2

Big Dig Waste - Boston Globe Report:

http://tinyurl.com/5sulty

Simplified Graph:

http://tinyurl.com/6j3may

Jeff Jacoby’s column:

http://tinyurl.com/5joxrz

A sampling of government employee retirement packages:
http://www.bostonherald.com/projects/boston_pensions/

More info on government employee retirement packages:

http://www.pensiontsunami.com/index.php

http://tinyurl.com/5hh5b6

We Cannot Be Ignorant and Free

Yesterday morning I was working on a post in which I was trying to grasp why people would vote for Obama. I had pulled up the article below several days ago but finally read the post today, after reading it I finally grasped why people are voting for Obama. Ignorance!

The following piece appeared on Regular Folks United.com.

We Cannot Be Ignorant and Free

Date: Sunday, October 19, 2008 Lori Roman


I keep hearing the same question asked: How could so many Americans vote for Barack Obama, a man who advocates socialist policies and associates with radical people who hate America?

I believe the answer is simple: We are not teaching our young people to understand and value the American experience and moral relativism has robbed them of their ability to make ethical judgments. I came to this conclusion after teaching college for six years. It is not an exaggeration to say this absolutely frightens me.

Academically our children are not equipped to appreciate and pursue the American Dream. Many children graduate from high school with good grades, but without fundamental skills. This fact is supported by the expensive array of remedial education classes that most colleges must provide freshman, as well as our dismal test rankings among other countries.

Uninformed people are easily fooled. Thomas Jefferson said: “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."

Conceptually, many Americans don't even understand the underpinnings of America, which, according to Thomas Jefferson are: (1) Freely elected government; (2) Free enterprise; and (3) Moral and spiritual values.

Students don't generally have trouble understanding freely elected government; however, they don't understand that it is to be cherished. In many textbooks all governmental systems are treated equally, therefore communist dictatorships are presented as just an alternative system of government.

Because I taught comparative economics, I saw first hand the apathy of my students—communism, socialism and democratic capitalism were different but equal in their eyes. They did not understand liberty as a fundamental human right.

My observations, as well as recent surveys, indicate that part of the problem stems from students being ignorant of American history. Frankly, in many cases Junior cannot have an intelligent discussion about the founding of this country, but he can put a condom on a banana in six seconds thanks to sex ed class.

My students believed that “government for the people" means that the government is supposed to do everything for the people. My classroom would become quiet when I would tell them that the Declaration of Independence only gives them the right to PURSUE happiness--they have to catch it themselves.

This may seem bizarre, considering that my students were usually business majors, but they also had no appreciation or understanding of the beauty of the free enterprise system, or its role in the prosperity and freedom of our country. But the good news is that when I explained Adam Smith's Invisible Hand Theory and showed them how one person's quest for personal profit ultimately brings prosperity to others, THEY GOT IT!

I can take a classroom of statists and turn them into capitalists in 10 weeks. This is not because I am such a great teacher, but because truth and common sense prevail.

These are not difficult concepts. Some time ago my twelve-year-old was playing a computer game called SIM City, in which he could design his own city and government and set taxes. As I looked at his city I saw a few cars moving through a small business district. A couple of minutes later, he excitedly told me to look at how his city had changed. There were more cars and a larger, bustling business district. Unfamiliar with the program, I asked him what he had done to create such improvement. "I lowered taxes!" he said and he rolled his eyes at me as only a twelve-year-old can, with an unspoken "duh, Mom!" I told him that he was brilliant and that I was sending him right to Washington. He apparently has a better grasp of economics than most politicians, including Obama.

My students' lack of understanding of Jefferson's third foundation--moral and spiritual values--was most alarming.

My most discouraging day was in an ethics class in which I had asked the students to list the characteristics of an ethical person. After a few minutes and a lot of silence, they listed: “A person who recycles and who does not make ethical judgments about others”. The reason they had such a difficult time with this exercise is that they have collectively been taught to believe the only truly unethical act is to brand anything that anyone else does as unethical. That night I thought, "I can turn a socialist into a capitalist, but I cannot, in ten weeks, undo the damage of a lifetime of being taught that there are no moral absolutes."

Time and time again our founding fathers reminded us that this noble experiment would not work without ethical and spiritual values because a government of the people, by the people and for the people can only be as good as the people.

Americans owe a debt of gratitude to those who worked and died to give them a freely elected government, a free enterprise system with opportunity for all, and a moral foundation on which to rest these freedoms. We must reclaim our heritage and pass it on to our children before it is too late. It is time--it is past time--to take back the textbooks and the classrooms and teach young Americans what it really means to be an American.

Only then will we see an informed electorate that will recognize socialism for the evil that it is--an attack on the God-given human right called liberty.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

The Declaration of Independence


Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Please Tell Me You Aren't Voting For McCain/Palin

I got an email from my college freshman daughter saying "please tell me you aren't voting for McCain/Palin". I shot one back saying "please tell me you are not voting for the ticket that will tax me to the point that I can no longer pay for your tuition and living expenses".

Haven't heard a word back.....lol.

The above was a comment posted on the story The Bradley Effect and kids (updated) on the American Thinker.


Teachers Push For Obama

The following piece appeared in Education Week. I wonder what the math and reading skills would be for students across America if teachers would spend as much effort educating students as they do campaigning for those who will get them more money. Even more disturbing is the incredible amount of money (taxpayer money) that is being used against taxpayers to get more taxpayer money. Teachers often whine that they are underpaid and over worked. Sure looks like to me they have money and time on their hands.

If you go to the article you will see that the American Federation of Teachers spent 10.4 million dollars during the 2008 election cycle and the NEA spent 3.4 million dollars during this same cycle. That money should could do a lot of good in a classroom. Than again it is a teachers' union about teachers and not a students' union.

Also interesting to point out is that "By the end of June—the latest breakdown of this data—747 donors who identified themselves as public school teachers had contributed a total of more than $321,500 to Sen. Obama." That works out to an average of 430 dollars per teacher. I know our family does not have that kind of money to spare. Once again I ask are teachers really underpaid?


Cathy

Unions Battle for Democrats in Swing States

Unions Battle for Democrats in Swing States


At the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers’ offices, Judi Moniot makes calls last week to urge support for candidates. —Photo by Jason Rearick for Education Week.
By Vaishali Honawar


Teachers’ unions around the country have shifted into high gear in the countdown to the presidential election next week, and nowhere is the fervor more evident than in the battleground states.

In Florida, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, affiliates of the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers have been campaigning with every tool at their disposal, including newsletters, fliers, postcards, and volunteers to reach out to more than 4 million members and their families.
The two national unions, which have both endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, have raised and spent large sums of money on this election, including on radio advertisements in those areas being closely contested by their candidate and Republican nominee John McCain.

With educators, as for most Americans, the economy is the biggest single issue this year, union officials say.
Teachers’ Pets

Donors identifying themselves as public school teachers gave the most to Barack Obama in this election cycle, through June.

SOURCES: Education Week; Center for Responsive Politics

“Whether it is the layoffs that have been happening in certain states, whether it is teachers who drive 60 miles to get to work, whether it is the gas prices that are high, ... the economy affects educators, and it is hitting them on a lot of different levels,” said Karen White, the political director of the 3.2 million-member NEA.

“The economy has trumped every other issue,” said Randi Weingarten, the president of the 1.4 million-member AFT. “State
and local governments are being faced with terrible Hobson’s choices” on what to cut from education spending, she said.
While “we don’t agree with everything Obama says, I give him credit for being open and upfront about his proposals and how he wants to ensure all children get a decent education in the wake of the economic situation,” Ms. Weingarten said.
The teachers’ unions have also praised Sen. Obama’s policies on health care and on key issues in education, including his support for early-childhood education, college affordability, and full funding for critical education programs.
Local union officials say they are seeing a never-before-evidenced sense of urgency among members in getting the vote out.
“There have been a lot of big elections, but I’ve never seen energy and excitement and the sheer number of volunteers as we’ve had in this election,” said Barbara Goodman, a spokeswoman for the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, an AFT affiliate.

By early October, officials said, the NEA and its affiliates had distributed more than 4.2 million pieces of mail, made more than 2.1 million phone calls, and sent more than 1.3 million e-mails to members in battleground states about the Nov. 4 presidential election.

Crossing State Lines

Affiliates reported an influx of members from other states to help out with volunteering. Members from Maryland and the District of Columbia are flooding into Virginia to help out, while members from Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey are offering their services to Pennsylvania affiliates, Ms. White said.

To wage their battle, the national unions’ political action committees have raised significant amounts of money for this election cycle. The AFT, though the smaller of the two unions, has been the bigger spender, having collected nearly $9 million and spent $10.4 million, including money left over from the last election cycle, by the end of September, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics, a Washington-based research group that tracks election spending.

In October alone, its PAC, Committee on Political Education, spent nearly $2 million targeting voters in swing states with radio ads favoring Sen. Obama. Ms. Weingarten said the ads are attempting to douse some of what she called the “mean-spirited” advertising by the McCain campaign that has tried, she said, to demonize the Illinois Democrat and his affiliations.
Almost all COPE spending was on Democratic races, with the AFT spending just 1 percent on Republicans.

The NEA spent more conservatively: just $3.4 million of the $5.9 million its PAC raised. Ms. White said, however, that by the end of the election cycle, she expects the union to have raised and spent at least $8 million. Eight percent of the NEA’s spending this election cycle was on Republicans.

According to Ms. White, the NEA is supporting several Republican candidates for local and statewide offices based on their support for education. In New York, for instance, the powerful New York State United Teachers, a merged AFT-NEA affiliate, is backing a number of state Senate Republicans who opposed midyear cuts in school aid.

Some policy experts say the teacher unions have a long history of supporting “liberal politicians.”
“It is no surprise that the NEA and the nation’s largest teacher unions would favor the candidate that favors expanding government,” said Dan Lips a senior policy analyst at the Washington-based Heritage Foundation. He added that there are “many teachers who would probably be concerned” by the unions’ “far-left agenda.”

An analysis by Education Week of a database from the Center for Responsive Politics shows, however that teachers who donate individually to federal campaigns also tend to give mostly to Democrats.
Union Election Activity

*Total through Oct. 22

SOURCE: Center for Responsive Politics
By the end of June—the latest breakdown of this data—747 donors who identified themselves as public school teachers had contributed a total of more than $321,500 to Sen. Obama. In contrast, Sen. McCain, the Arizona Republican, had received about $46,500 from 56 donors identifying themselves as public school teachers.
Carrots or Sticks

The unions’ unequivocal support for Sen. Obama comes despite the fact that he does not see eye to eye with them on some core issues. His support for teacher performance pay and charter schools, for instance, has not been greeted enthusiastically by the unions.

Some leaders of state affiliates that have struggled with such issues as charter schools say, however, that they believe they can work out their differences if Mr. Obama is elected.

“While we may not agree with him 100 percent, he has demonstrated a willingness to talk,” said Ohio Federation of Teachers President Sue Taylor. “The way I phrase this is, do we want sticks or do we want carrots?”

Ms. Taylor pointed to the No Child Left Behind Act. Sen. Obama, who was not yet in Congress when it was enacted, “understands [the law] is a totally unfunded mandate and that there is more to teaching than tests,” she said. Ms. Taylor said she is also happy that he opposes vouchers. The union has opposed Ohio’s 4-year-old voucher program as well as the older Cleveland one enacted by the state legislature in 1995.

As for Sen. McCain, Ms. Taylor said, the union has not seen evidence that he is interested in improving education. And, she added, “he has not shown any interest in working with us.”

To help Sen. Obama’s bid for the White House, AFT people from Ms. Weingarten to retired members of the union and its affiliates are pitching in.

The union president already has been campaigning in such key states as Florida, Ohio, and Virginia, and on Oct. 31 is scheduled to embark on a three-day bus tour through Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.

In Philadelphia, Lorraine McRae Overton, a retired school-community coordinator, has been volunteering every day at the local AFT affiliate’s offices, where she coordinates the phone bank.

Sen. Obama, Ms. Overton said, touched a chord with her because he once worked as a community organizer—a job that she says had similarities to her own. The Democrat not only understands the importance of education, she said, but also such issues as Medicare, Social Security, and health care, which are important to retired union members and senior citizens.
“We’re truly working for him here, and I will give him my all,” she said.

Other Races

In the hotly contested Virginia race, Bill Johnson, a spokesman for the Virginia Education Association, said the NEA affiliate is focusing on the presidential race as well as the U.S. Senate election. Former Gov. Mark Warner, a Democrat whom the union supports, is pitted against former Gov. James S. Gilmore III, a Republican, for the open seat.

“Our strategy has been to first make sure that every member knows about the recommendation and how it’s made, and we’ve done that through our statewide publications,” Mr. Johnson said.

Each undecided member will have received at least five union mailings during the election season intended to inform them about the candidates, he said.

Sandy Sullivan, the president of the Loudoun Education Association in Virginia, an NEA affiliate, said her union has a postcard-writing party scheduled for this week. To the preprinted postcards, “our members add a note, something like, ‘Hope to see you at the polls,’ ” to ensure members get out to vote on Election Day, she said.

In Miami-Dade County, Fla., said Frederick Ingram, the secretary-treasurer of United Teachers of Dade, a merged affiliate of the AFT and the NEA, the union has mobilized its retirees, among other members. “They’re working here at our offices from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. phone-banking,” he said.

The national unions have sent staff members from headquarters to all the swing states to help affiliates with campaigning. The NEA, said Ms. White, has deployed close to 100 staff members nationwide.

In addition to the presidential race, both unions are focusing on congressional, gubernatorial, and state legislative and local races that they consider essential to furthering their agendas.

Altogether, Ms. White said, the NEA is involved in 44 U.S. House races, 11 Senate races, and four gubernatorial races.
The AFT is focusing on 10 Senate races and 35 House races, among others, Ms. Weingarten said.
Still, it is the presidential race that has energized the union forces.

Ms. Taylor of the Ohio Federation of Teachers said local affiliates have been hard at work to let members know what the union deems the major differences between the two candidates.

As of last week, a CNN-Time poll showed Sen. Obama holding a 50 percent lead over Sen. McCain’s 46 percent among likely voters in Ohio. The poll had a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

“Staff from the AFT and from our New York colleagues,” Ms. Taylor said, “are taking vacation time and volunteering and assisting. Everyone knows we are ground zero.”

Research Librarian Rachael Delgado and Library Intern Colin Welch contributed to this story.
Vol. 28, Issue 10, Pages 1,14-15


Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Are Bill and Melinda Gates Being Taken for a Ride?

Jim and I first came across "Ed in 08" in July 2007. At that time the agenda of the group was not clear but we both expressed concern that it appeared to be a group whose sole function was to get more money for education.

Last night Jim attended an Ed in 08 meeting in Henniker. One of those present was state educrat Fred Bramante.

The movie started an hour before Jim arrived. After the meeting three panelists discussed Ed in 08. Questions from the audience were often hijacked by Fred Branante's self promotion. Many in the audience were education students from New England college. The meeting ended exactly at 8:00 with no serious discussion about education reform.

After the meeting Jim approached the other two speakers, fully knowing that prior conversations with Fred Bramante were fruitless.

Jim pointed out that ED in 08 had no clear mission, making their motives suspect. The
speaker said others have pointed that out as well. The speaker admitted that one goal was to nationalize educational standards.

Schools have a spending problem not a funding problem. Millions of dollars are wasted at the national level with The Department of Education, providing no educational benefit to students sitting in a classroom. The same can be said of the New Hampshire Department of Education - bureaucratic bloat conferring no educational benefits
to students.

True education reform would include:

1. Full parental school choice with the money following the child not the
institution.

2. The elimination of tenure.

3. Full right-to-work opportunities for individual teachers with the right to
completely sever ties with the union if they so choose.

4. Use of effective educational methods such as phonics to learn to
read and Singapore math as opposed to educational fads such as
everyday math, Chicago math, trailblazers. Focus on Core Curriculum.

5. The rights for parents to direct their children's education.

6. Full homeschooling rights.